Hello, sweet Bloggamathingy...
Today I have once again been pondering the thought of making flying a better experience for everyone.
You will of course remember my previous submission here on creating 'family sections' aboard intercontinental and long-haul flights, along with my award-winning designs for baby crates (allowing the little ones to be put into the cargo holds of aircraft, thus ensuring a wonderful trip for the rest of us). What's that? You don't remember? Ah, well, here's a link so you can go back and refresh your obviously faltering memory (and you may want to go see a doctor right away to make sure you are not suffering from some debilitating brain disorder, just a friendly helpful suggestion...)
I still remain firmly committed to trying to goad all the major carriers into establishing Family Sections. It would be sooooo easy and all those who cannot afford or don't want to spend the outrageous money to sit up front in First or Business but still would like to be treated with a little respect and dignity and not be subjected to those mewling, squawking brats oh-so-many parents seem to feel the necessity of bringing aboard would thank each and every carrier a million-fold.
Imagine, dear airlines, what nice extra money you could make by charging a modest service fee to sit in a baby-free zone on a long-haul flight? I'm sure there are millions of harassed long-haul passengers who would gladly shell out for the ability to sit in an area of Economy without babies, devoid of seat-back kicking junior terrorists and without raucous families sharing their particular dysfunctions and bliss with all of those around them...
The how-to is quite simple.
First, launch an ad campaign promoting the fact that the seats at the back of each plane are safer in crashes, statistically having more survivors. This could be quite effective visually... show a jet liner in its final moments before break up, plunging Earthward, with a family up front in tears, sobbing, terrified. Now pan the camera to the family sitting in the back of the plane in the all-new 'Family Section,' calmly reading magazines, watching their video screens, looking totally relaxed and even smiling, despite the fact that the plane is about to crash...
The announcer intones in quiet, soothing tones:
"See how relaxed the Joneses are? They know their chances of survival are statistically 100 percent higher than those of the Smiths up front. That's why they booked new 'Family Class.' Don't you want your family to survive in the case of an unforeseen tragic airline accident? Think about it. Book new 'Family Class' next time you fly long-haul or intercontinental with Air X."
Those family seats will sell like hotcakes!
Just to make sure there are no foul-ups, there would have to be a few small changes to the reservations software used at check-ins, of course. Anyone buying a ticket for himself or herself plus a minor under say, age 14, would have to automatically be shown only seats in Family Class on the seat selection page. And, of course, the software would need to be rewritten to make sure those crafty sneaks out there who would buy tickets for themselves and then for their children as unaccompanied minors in order to avoid having to sit with their little darlings in the Family Section couldn't trick out the program. The same would hold true for unaccompanied minors - the software ticketing them and allowing seat selection would automatically provide only the row at the very back immediately adjacent to the galley for selection where those well-trained flight attendants could keep their eyes on the little tykes at all times.
The only problem I am able to come up with right now are those silly parents who insist on 'bulkhead' seats to hang their damned bassinettes on, but I am sure Recaro, ZIM, B/E Aerospace or one of the many other seat-makers to the airline industry can come up with some groovy ideas there...
And those who travel without children but insist on sitting in the new Family Section [maybe they are lonely and desire the abuse or perhaps they want to be able to survive better in the event of an unforeseen crash, too? Who knows? There are lots of weirdos traveling these days, as we all know...] can be easily persuaded not to ('full of children,' 'really noisy,' etc.) or, if they insist on sitting there 'anyway,' subjected to an extra fee for taking up 'space dedicated to families.'
Lest you think me totally nuts and are certain that no one else is pondering such frivolous needs as Family Sections, here's some more reading on the subject... and here's more... and still more...
In summary, instituting Family Sections would make flying easier and better for those of us who don't want noisy babies and loud dysfunctional families around them during that long flight to Grandma's house or to that business meeting the next morning (with the employer who was too cheap to put us in Business in the first place, as they should have).
Yes, airline companies, it's a win-win-win-win-win idea! Now, get cracking!
Let's segue to the next topic at hand. As my friend Gina recently pointed out in a comment on my original Family Sections proposal, there is also something to be said for preventing smelly people from flying.
In the interest of the odor-free flying public worldwide, I propose that airlines in future (on their websites, when booking, or at the airport or in the departure lounge) ask travellers to fill out a brief questionnaire. It could, of course, be coupled or combined with other useful, personally invasive questions such as those found on U.S. immigration forms asking visitors whether they are Nazis or plan to explode bombs while visiting the country.
Here are some questions that should be asked:
- What foods have you eaten today? (Please make a complete list of everything you have ingested in the past 12 hours.)
- When did you last evacuate your bowels? (Please be accurate to within 30 minutes.)
- Do you suffer from chronic flatulence?
- If you feel a whopping SBD* coming on, do you feel compelled to share it with others or do you discreetly head for the toilet?
- Do you habitually ingest a lot of legumes? Are you vegetarian or vegan or some other form of weird greens-only eating human?
- Are you wearing antiperspirant less than 8 hours old and have you changed your clothes within 4 hours of beginning your travel?
- Are you carrying large amounts of smelly cheese on your person or wearing onions or garlic as decorative accessories?
- Do you suffer from any of the following: Bromhidrosis, halitosis, axillary hyperhidrosis, onychomycosis? [Gentle reader, Google those if they do not mean anything to you. They are the medical terms for various disgusting body odors.]
- Are you wearing diapers? Is any member of your party wearing diapers? When were they last changed? (Please be accurate to within 15 minutes.)
- Are you or any members of your party dead or decomposing?
_______
*SBD: Silent-But-Deadly. Flatulence of the sneakiest, most dangerous kind.
After completing the questionnaire, answers would be evaluated by trained airport security personnel, which would then also perform an odor check as part of the security scan. Passengers would be instructed to raise their arms during the walk through and while being scanned for explosives, weapons, and the like, a scent-sniffer would also sample and react to any over body odors or disgusting aromas. It could even be adjusted to alert if someone is wearing too much perfume or cologne, or an especially offensive cheap brand. [N.B.Those 'over-scented' passengers would be weeded out and forced to shower before being allowed to catch the next flight to wherever.]
At smaller airports, specially trained odor experts could do the job, as seen in the photo above left. Such measures would help to prevent experiences like mine during my last trip to Africa:
I arrived at the airport in Germany, only to learn that the airplane we were supposed to be taking was kaputt, and instead the airline had substituted a smaller version of the same plane, meaning a lucky 30 or 40 of us supposed to fly would not be on board that evening...
After a peaceful night in an airport hotel which was surprisingly nice, I was rebooked by said airline. My new trip took me via several other countries on a hopscotch of routes cobbled together in order for me to get me to my destination in a time frame of under a week, since the aircraft type in question had been grounded by the manufacturer for an unknown period due to engine problems.
I boarded my first flight to Beirut, Lebanon. The airline was nice enough to upgrade me to Business class for the enitre journey, which was a good thing... but do read on.
In the Beirut plane, I sat next to a gentleman who felt the need to gas me with the foulest flatulence I have ever had to endure during the entire three-hour flight, all the while stocking up on more odor-producing legumes in the form of tahini, baba ganoush, and other delights of the Middle East known to cause voluminous gas clouds once digested. The worst part was that there was no warning. Each time I was about to be enveloped in yet another deadly yet unseen veil of malodorus fumes, my seatmate passed his toxins quietly, subtly and with an elegance unsurpassed for someone who is breaking deadly winds that could have been used as the basis for a new poison gas... and he supplemented it by speaking to me in a steady stream of garlic breath! Of coourse, it was just my luck that Business was completely full that evening, so I was unable to plot an escape to another seat... I was nearly comatose by the time we landed in Beirut and so grateful for being able to escape into the lovely airport with its functioning air conditioning and odor-free environment.
Next, I boarded another airline's plane to Abu Dhabi. Here, again in Business, I was spoiled by a menu that was hard to choose from since it was so voluminous, but sadly also contained salmon, a variety of exquisitely stinky cheeses and a number of other malodorous choices which my fellow travelers all seemed to revel in choosing, rather than sticking to such pleasant-smelling fare as Carbonnade a la Flamande, Duck Bigarade or a delightful Boeuf a la Wellington.
All too quickly the rather cramped space of the Business cabin became a foul blend of disgusting food-borne odors (most likely mixed with a few discreetly emitted bouts of flatulence and stifled belching). By the time we landed in Abu Dhabi (sand, sand and more sand everywhere!) and I was able to repair to the Business lounge for my eight-hour layover, I was nearly in need of a respirator and oxygen tank.
The flight to Johannesburg aboard the same airline also had an odorific episode. The gentleman (and I do employ the term in a very loose fashion here) sitting across the aisle from me apparently felt more at ease bedding down for the night on his flat-bed seat than I did; he removed all of his clothing except his undershorts and emitted such delightful body odor that at one point one of the flight attendants was seen discreetly scenting the air using disinfectant spray as he slept. The fumes from the spray can at last helped me pass out and drift into a semi-vegetative sleep-state...
When I arrived in South Africa, naturally I was a wreck from all the malodorous assaults on my poor proboscis. It took me nearly a week to recover. And so, on the basis of personal experience and the experiences of others, I feel it is high time to institute such new controls as outlined above. What do you think, dear reader? Your input is welcome...
Now last, but not least, is the issue of fat people flying.
I am a fat people. I fly. Often. And while parts of me may sort of 'ooze' over the limits of my minuscule airplane seat (when I'm in Economy), the only person who has ever complained with an absolute slip of a thing who didn't even fill half of her seat and had no reason to complain at all... but the crux of the matter is the fact that the airlines insist on using silly measurements that only about 30% of the world's population could describe as "adequate," let alone "bearable" or even "generous."
The answer to this dilemma is easy: Make the airlines change their seats. There is an interesting discussion brewing on just this very topic worldwide on varioous and sundry passenger fora, and it is also being looked at by airlines. (One of the more perverse suggestions from carriers is Ryanair's notion that on shorter routes, they should be allowed to substitute rack-like devices designed to support standing passengers rather than provide real seats!)
Naturally, a lot of the major carriers claim to have redesigned their seats with thinner backs allowing for tighter seat pitch (the distance between seats) but any idiot understands that if I have thick seat backs at a pitch of 34 inches, which I replace with new seat backs allowing for a 31 inch seat pitch, I still have only 31 inches between the seats, even if it supposedly "feels" like 34...
Of course airlines love these new seats. They are lighter, meaning they save expensive fuel, and because they are closer together, that old 89-seat cabin now holds 100 passengers.... who wouldn't love that? Passengers! (Here is a great article about just this topic...)
So now what should we all do till we can make airlines acquiesce and give in to demands for Family Sections, passenger body odor prevention measures and better, bigger seats? Well, again another link... here's a great way to make flying and your entire vaction more pleasant... you just have to do your homework, and this article will show you how.
Well, Bloggy, it has been a while since I last posted, so I promise to visit more often and more regularly. Until then, toodles!
Recent Comments